🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that indecision over how to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue details a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want more sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of hallowed earth.